- Endless space 2 mac mono framework for free#
- Endless space 2 mac mono framework software#
- Endless space 2 mac mono framework license#
It is patented, but that patent makes allowances for open source users. Some of them are actually just people and programmers.
Endless space 2 mac mono framework software#
I dislike Microsoft as much as the next free software user, but not everyone at the company is an evil cultist bent on world domination.
Endless space 2 mac mono framework for free#
Jim Miller at Microsoft has made a statement on the patents covering ISO/ECMA, (he is one of the inventors listed in the patent): here ()īasically a grant is given to anyone who want to implement those components for free and for any purpose.Īnd as for the Trojan thing, what exactly does that even mean in this context? The nature of an open sourced program prohibits that. NET Framework, and what has been patented by Microsoft falls under the ECMA/ISO submission.
Endless space 2 mac mono framework license#
Mono is available under both GPL/LPGL and proprietary license (you get to choose) Ubuntu's default is obviously the GPL one.Īlso, as long as the free mono is used under the GPL, it cannot be used by Microsoft as patent leverage. While Mono.Net is the future and needs to be avoided, before becoming problematic. Wine is legacy, which a Linux user can avoid, nobody in their right mind would built some part into Gnome using Wine as dependancy - so there is a difference: Mono in contrast does create new dependancies of critical parts IF built into something like Gnome. You wouldn't recommend building something new under Linux using Wine (I do know some programs like Google-stuff does anyway).
![endless space 2 mac mono framework endless space 2 mac mono framework](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/screen-shot-2018-05-30-at-10-40-17-am.jpg)
Wine's focus is primarily legacy-support. Well, for the $-sign: For the lone argument of not feeding a troll, I changed it. Next thing you will be asking is for wine to be remeved from the repos! If applications happen to be based on mono, I don't see why you should hold that against them. Btw, just so you know, mono is actually released under the GPL, LGPL and the MIT lisencse. Add this to your small post cound and all alarms are yelling "troll!". You put a $ in MS, therefore (IMO) your argumunt has little meret from the get-go.
![endless space 2 mac mono framework endless space 2 mac mono framework](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/screen-shot-2018-06-04-at-2-39-00-pm.jpg)
![endless space 2 mac mono framework endless space 2 mac mono framework](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2018052809445100-e7260330e4b7d47c63ff99ba9689d77c.jpg)
There is even a blog-how-to remove mono completely:īut why even put it in there in the first place?ĭo you think this hurts or helps Ubuntu (and Linux) in the long-term? “Moonlight is usable for anyone on any distribution of Linux (redhat, ubuntu, etc.) - it is not limited just to Novell as Mono is.” Now I don't want to start a discussion on how Mono might be perceived as untangled - it is clearly not: It would not be so much of a problem, if MS put everything Mono-related under GPLv3 - with no strings whatsoever attached. It's enough Novell does this, why must Ubuntu and therefore taking away potentially alternatives? Ubuntu basically grants Microsoft the leverage-tactic it uses so effectively on its own platform - shipping as default inclusion on the system. I do not understand why Mark Shuttleworth doesn't take precautions so that Ubuntu isn't tainted by a potentially trojanesque software.Įxcluding Banshee, F-Spot and Tomboy shouldn't be that much of a deal - that way, it will probably be a lot less interesting to include more and more Mono-based programs by default. This poll is to find out how other Ubuntu-Users feel towards Mono being included in Ubuntu-default.